🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it appears it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an celebration that began as a festivity and recollection of history, culture and the connections between Black populations worldwide, has developed a business-like atmosphere, growing to encompass events where individuals of African heritage are compensated to talk to white audiences about implicit prejudice and supportive partnership. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s sparked an increase in the business of showcasing anti-racist commitment. But even that moment has passed. The wave has peaked, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The History of Black History Celebration

Originally observed in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was created in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with a week of celebration and reflection in the second week of February. Black History Month developed from this initiative and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the US and Canada in February, but also in October in the UK, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Netherlands.

The month has evolved since those days, giving reduced attention to the accounts of transatlantic enslavement and struggles for equality, and greater focus on prominent Black figures in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and widely honoring the input Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with talks and cultural events. But the method the celebration is celebrated is a indication of the contemporary political context. How it progresses is a instructive case in how co-option leads to erosion: the transformation of Black History Month has impeded the point of it, which is to address embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Little demonstrates how crucial it is to reconsider Black History Month as much as the current time in which it takes place this year. In the UK, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we witnessed the largest far-right rally in British history. Kemi Badenoch, the person of color at the helm of the right-wing political group, is a staunch adversary of the racial justice movement, and we are in a situation where a member of parliament feels emboldened to say that a lack of white people in parts of a city is a reason for concern. Meanwhile, far-right parties are expanding in the EU as a complete entity.

In the US, a massive attack against DEI and affirmative action has been carried, frequently with success, to the top legal institutions of the state. A effort to remove Black history and legacy from the archives is ongoing. One of Donald Trump's initial presidential directives aimed at the museum of African American legacy, and the renowned cultural organization, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by depicting the United States “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the observance illustrates how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or politically neutered celebrations of historical achievements, rather than addressing the conditions of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its restricted time span means that it is separated from the broader ongoing work that is necessary. A university professor, a prof at University of Greenwich, put it best when she voiced worries about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The issue with adopting a symbolic stance”, she wrote, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month becomes a fleeting performance rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to adjust, modify and expand efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a inclination to just discontinue things like Black History Month completely, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are remnants of an period that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and heritage of activism for racial justice – community-based BLM initiatives, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and indeed, including corporate presentations – constitute an infrastructure that a significant effort has been invested in. It is there not just to decay as the politics moves on (and in fact, regresses), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month seem? Firstly, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is spread out through the year (as some institutions are already commencing), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a era that does not evade governmental matters, and provides room for individuals, particularly the younger generation, to share their anxieties and narratives. What purpose serves simple recognition of the history when it fails to address the present reality of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the street? Establishments who celebrate it should not be reassured with the passive language of hidden discrimination and alertness to minor insults, but confronted with the risks that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not taken seriously. To summarize, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and adaptive. Maybe an entire name rebrand is required – Black History is Now Month.